blog


stop signs suck

[]

this is gonna be rambly bc i’ve been drinking but bear with me, i have thought about this a lot.

like, i know, stop signs are iconic, and it’s great that kids know what an octagon is in this country by the time they’re 2 years old, but that’s basically where the benefits of stop signs end.

stop signs, to me, are part of what i think of as “aspirational infrastructure”. this is infrastructure or rules of the road, that seem like good ideas for safety reasons, but are counteracted entirely by the reality of road design & driving. an example that i think a lot of people can relate to is max speeds. roads in america are not DESIGNED for the top speed that the signage says. so you’ll get straight shot roads with huge lanes and nothing in your way, and you’re supposed to go 25mph on them. but NOBODY does this!

what this does is it creates drivers who routinely break these rules. the only reason not to break these rules is because you might get ticketed, not because driving at a higher speed feels unsafe (like proper road design would do).

american road design is absolutely packed with these aspirational designs, where the signage is saying one thing (usually, the safe thing), but the road design SCREAMS for you to ignore it. if you’re not supposed to park on the sidewalk, why is the sidewalk soft so its easy to do? why are the turns soft so that you can blast thru them at double the speed that the rulebook said? and so on!

the other day i saw a tweet by someone saying that their friend just does U-turns wherever they feel like. like, yeah, there’s signs but they dont feel unsafe doing it. this is a moral failing, to be sure, but its also an infrastructure failing. if you don’t want U-turns, design the road so that U-turns are all but impossible (not hard to do), and you won’t have U-turns.

anyway. i feel most people are on the same page about the above, but for some reason stop signs don’t seem to get the same scrutiny from infrastructure folks from what i’ve seen. like, with stop signs, you’re supposed to come to a FULL stop, EVERY time. very safe, right? but it goes against every instinct and design of any vehicle you care to move thru traffic: car, bike1, motorcycle, you name it. it just fucks with your flow so bad. having to come to a dead stop and then move the thousands of pounds of metal again is such a pain (not to mention pollutive). and on a bike you’re using your muscles to do it so it’s even worse arguably!

so what happens? over time, you kiiiinda stop but nobody’s coming, you KNOW nobody’s coming, you’ve lived on this street for like 6 years, and by now… you roll thru the stop sign. everybody does it. you do this again and again and it becomes a habit. now the stop sign is useless for safety because instead of drivers paying attention when approaching an intersection, they see a stop sign and go “i wonder who that sign is for” while rolling thru and (after doing it a thousand times) hitting a pedestrian.

on top of that, 4 way stop signs that are busy, are big bottlenecks for traffic. going through the stop 1 car at a time is SO SLOW. it’s confusing too (i think anyway, ymmv on this). roundabouts are the answer here! or at the VERY least, raised and narrowed intersections with yield signs instead of stop signs (or even no signs at all). roundabouts are massively safer (you CANNOT blast thru a roundabout at top speed, and that is a feature), while also promoting better flow, and imo being a ton simpler.

idk i just get annoyed thinking about places like strong towns arguing in favor of stop signs like. no! argue for diverting traffic away from these conflicts to begin with. make residential areas hostile to cars by making them a maze of one way streets, or even ban cars outright from these areas so kids can play on the street again. stop signs suck shit


1 (the idea that cyclists should have to stop at a stop sign is bonkers bananas in its own right, absolutely not. thankfully SOME places are putting in “stop as yield” for cyclists but while i think that makes sense, this does further complicate the rules with weird exceptions that arent obvious from what you’re seeing on the road, and i cant imagine a car understanding that a bike can do that but they can’t… just… get rid of the fuckin stop signs and use something better)


5 responses to “stop signs suck”

  1. Aura

    Lmao I feel this in a very particular way which is that I live right next to a busy 4-way stop where there are NONSTOP accidents, I hear crashing noises outside at least once every few weeks and go “ah there they go again” and life goes on, nothing changes except some more cars are trashed

  2. vis

    Irt the “aspirational infrastructure” thing: oftentimes, the end result of this kind of irrational signage and following irreverance from drivers is just that the speed limit gets raised or the sign gets removed or whatever. From (i think) Killed by a Traffic Engineer by Wes Marshall

    “In 2009, a 60-year-old Los Angeles woman named Victoria Ramos was run over and killed in a crosswalk on Zelzah Avenue. Zelzah Avenue is a four-lane arterial near Cal State Northridge with a speed limit of 35 mph. A few months earlier, 19-year-old student Johoney Lobos was killed when trying to cross the same street. She was also in a crosswalk. The city did a study and found that 68 percent of drivers speed here. Given a high crash rate as well, one might expect some drastic physical changes in the near future. Instead, the city raised the speed limit to 40 mph so it could resume [traffic] enforcement.

    “Over the next decade, Zelzah Avenue became one of the “city’s most dangerous streets for pedestrians and bicyclists,” with 13 pedestrian or bike crashes over three years along a short two-mile stretch of road. So the city did another traffic study and found an 85th percentile speed of 48 mph. They rounded down but still raised the speed limit again, this time to 45 mph.”

    (I think that’s where the quote is from, it’s from Alyaza’s reading tag: https://cohost.org/alyaza/post/7286232-the-neverending-d)

      1. vis

        Oh boy, I did not realize there weren’t paragraph breaks on these :p But yep. There are no safety considerations involved. From the same book: “So, why do we want to reduce crashes? We do so because crashes increase traffic congestion and reduce mobility. We also do so because crashes cost us money. Misidentified priorities lead right into how we mismeasure transportation, which we’ll talk about later. At best, we can say that we have conflicting objectives in transportation. Sure, traffic engineers want to improve safety, but before doing so, we want to minimize congestion, maximize mobility, minimize costs, and so on. Safety is never first on the list.”

        1. surasshu

          oh the paragraph breaks show up in the back end! i’ll have to check that out sometime lol.

          i was just shocked at the ass-backwardsness of this story. “if we increase the speed limit fewer ppl are speeding” uhhhh???????? i guess thats ONE way to match the speed limit to the design of the road: the most idiotic way possible. and they say america doesn’t have culture

Leave a Reply

Your email address will not be published. Required fields are marked *

Your post must include a link to this post.

How does this work?
Webmentioned this post? Send the link:

a 88x31 button with a maroon character called "eggbug", with the text "i was on cohost!" bobbing up and down. clicking on this will bring you to a google sheet listing blogs that were spun off when cohost ended
aivi
digital fusion
pluswav
infloresce records
aurahack's blog, days and wonder
aura
dispatch from the radical dreamland (lena raine)
kayin works
someplace elsewhere
meow! garden (home of ashastral)
unlimited trees, character saying "meow meow" (links to unlimitedtrees' game UNITRES dreams on newgrounds)
im rob :)
fungus zone
IT IS JOE WINTERGREEN
cd-rom journal
Laura's blog
Azhdarchid
matajuegos
Discard Pile

link to me:

a 88x31 sized button with the word "surasshu" and a tracker scrolling behind it
a 88x31 sized button with the word "surasshu" and a tracker behind it, still

© surasshu